net.ihe.gazelle.assets.SearchCriteria : 23 assertions found for this search Review filtered assertions

Assertion

Applies to

Applied to
Not applied to

Coverage

Covered by
Not covered by
Id scheme
Assertion id
Status
Testable?
#Coverage
#Applies to
Comment
Predicate
Page
Tags
Last changed
Actions
ATNAATNA-10Testable 0 2 Audit Record Repository actor which claims support of the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile shall support the Record Audit Event [ITI-20] transaction.69Table 9.1-14/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-12Testable 0 2 Secure Node actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile shall support the Record Audit Event [ITI-20] transaction69Table 9.1-14/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-13Testable 0 2 This is a grouping requirement. ITI-1 is not required by the ATNA profile. > According to 2nd Review group, the TF is the reference.Secure Node actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile shall perform the Maintain Time [ITI-1] transaction72Table 9.3-14/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-15Testable 0 2 Secure Application actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile may perform the Maitain Time [ITI-1] transaction72Table 9.3-14/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-16Testable 0 2 see previous comment on ITI-19Secure Application actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile may perform the Record Audit Event [ITI-20] transaction69Table 9.1-14/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-20Testable 0 2 The Audit Repository shall support both audit transport mechanisms 70Section 9.1.1.34/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-21Testable 0 2 The Audit Repository shall support any IHE-specified audit message format, when sent over one of those transport mechanisms. Note that new applications domains may have their own extended vocabularies in addition to the DICOM and IHE vocabularies. This also means that an ATNA Audit Repository is also automatically a Radiology Basic Security Profile Audit Repository because it must support the IHE Provisional Message format and it must support the BSD syslog protocol70Section 9.1.1.34/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-22Testable 0 2 The Audit Repository shall support self protections and user access controls70Section 9.1.1.34/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-23Testable 0 2 Secure Node actor may support the Radiology Audit Trail option71Table 9.2-14/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-24Testable 0 2 Secure Application actors may support the Radiology Audit Trail option71Table 9.2-14/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-25Testable 0 1 Actors in the IHE Radiology domain Profiles which claim support of the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile are required to implement the Radiology Audit Trail option.83Section 9.5.24/30/19 4:13:18 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-26Testable 0 0 Agreed to do not cover this assertionAudit Record Forwarder actor which claims support of the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile shall support the Record Audit Event [ITI-20] transaction.69Table 9.1-17/26/19 10:00:08 AM by aeschlimann
ATNAATNA-27Testable 0 0 The Secure Node shall use the Authenticate Node transaction for all network connections to or from the node that may expose private information as specified in ITI TF-2a: 3.1969Section 9.1.1.17/26/19 10:00:08 AM by aeschlimann
ATNAATNA-3Testable 0 2 A Secure Node Actor shall be configurable to support both connection authentication and physically secured networks 72Section 9.44/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-30reviewedTestable 0 1 The Secure Application shall detect and report a Record Audit Event as specified in ITI TF-2a: 3.2070Section 9.1.1.27/8/19 5:09:19 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-31reviewedTestable 0 1 The Audit Repository shall support all messages complying with the Syslog RFCs shall be accepted. The Audit Repository may ignore or process messages in non-IHE message formats. This may be for backwards compatibility or other reasons.70Section 9.1.1.37/8/19 5:09:22 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-32reviewedTestable 0 1 The Audit Record Forwarder shall be grouped with an Audit Record Repository71Section 9.1.1.47/8/19 5:09:25 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-33reviewedTestable 0 1 The Audit Record Forwarder shall filter and forward Syslog messages as they arrive. Filter and forward is described in ITI TF-2a: 3.20 and Syslog RFC5424. 71Section 9.1.1.47/8/19 5:09:31 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-34reviewedTestable 0 1 The Audit Record Forwarder shall be configurable to forward messages to destination Audit Record Repositories.71Section 9.1.1.47/8/19 5:09:34 PM by NicolasBailliet
ATNAATNA-4Testable 0 4 The mechanism for logging audit record messages to the audit record repository shall be either Transmission of Syslog Messages over UDP (RFC5426) with The Syslog Protocol (RFC5424) which formalizes and obsoletes Syslog (RFC-3164), either 2) Transmission of Syslog Messages over TLS (RFC5425) with The Syslog Protocol (RFC5424) which formalizes sending syslog messages over a streaming protocol protectable by TLS.72Section 9.34/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet