| ATNA | ATNA-10 | | Testable |
0
|
2
| | Audit Record Repository actor which claims support of the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile shall support the Record Audit Event [ITI-20] transaction. | 69 | Table 9.1-1 | 5/22/23 2:18:09 PM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-12 | | Testable |
0
|
2
| | Secure Node actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile shall support the Record Audit Event [ITI-20] transaction | 69 | Table 9.1-1 | 6/27/22 4:37:57 PM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-15 | | Testable |
0
|
2
| | Secure Application actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile may perform the Maitain Time [ITI-1] transaction | 72 | Table 9.3-1 | 6/29/22 11:39:13 AM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-16 | | Testable |
0
|
2
| see previous comment on ITI-19 | Secure Application actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile may perform the Record Audit Event [ITI-20] transaction | 69 | Table 9.1-1 | 6/29/22 11:49:04 AM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-20 | | Testable |
0
|
2
| | The Audit Repository shall support both audit transport mechanisms
| 70 | Section 9.1.1.3 | 4/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-21 | | Testable |
0
|
2
| | The Audit Repository shall support any IHE-specified audit message format, when sent over one of those transport mechanisms. Note that new applications domains may have their own extended vocabularies in addition to the DICOM and IHE vocabularies. This also means that an ATNA Audit Repository is also automatically a Radiology Basic Security Profile Audit Repository because it must support the IHE Provisional Message format and it must support the BSD syslog protocol | 70 | Section 9.1.1.3 | 6/29/22 2:22:50 PM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-3 | | Testable |
0
|
2
| | A Secure Node Actor shall be configurable to support both connection authentication and physically secured networks | 72 | Section 9.4 | 4/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-4 | | Testable |
0
|
4
| | The mechanism for logging audit record messages to the audit record repository shall be either Transmission of Syslog Messages over UDP (RFC5426) with The Syslog Protocol (RFC5424) which formalizes and obsoletes Syslog (RFC-3164), either 2) Transmission of Syslog Messages over TLS (RFC5425) with The Syslog Protocol (RFC5424) which formalizes sending syslog messages over a streaming protocol protectable by TLS. | 72 | Section 9.3 | 4/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-6 | | Testable |
0
|
4
| | A means must be provided to upload the required certificates to the implementation, e.g., via floppy disk or file transfer via network. | 72 | Section 9.4 | 4/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-7 | | Testable |
0
|
2
| I don't know what this assertion means. | When an IHE profile requires a grouping of an actor with either Secure Node or Secure Application, then the ATNA requirements apply to all actors in the implementation. | 72 | Section 9.3.1 | 4/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-8 | | Testable |
0
|
2
| | When an implementation chooses to support this Integration Profile for an actor, it is required that all IHE actors and any other activities in this implementation support the Audit Trail and Node Authentication Integration Profile. | 72 | Section 9.4 | 4/30/19 4:13:19 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| CT | CT-1 | reviewed | Testable |
0
|
2
| | When the Time Server is grouped with a Time Client to obtain time from a higher tier Time Server, the Time Client shall utilize NTP | 59 | Section 7 | 8/26/19 5:25:26 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| CT | CT-2 | reviewed | Testable |
0
|
2
| | For some Time Clients that are not grouped with a Time Server, SNTP may be usable. | 59 | Section 7 | 4/30/19 5:20:24 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| CT | CT-3 | reviewed | Testable |
0
|
2
| | Time Server actor which claims support for the Consistent Time (CT) integration profile shall perform the Maintain Time [ITI-1] transaction | 60 | Table 7.1-1 | 4/30/19 5:20:24 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| CT | CT-5 | reviewed | Testable |
0
|
2
| | Time Server actor may implement the Secured NT option | 60 | Table 7.2-1 | 4/30/19 5:20:24 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| CT | CT-6 | reviewed | Testable |
0
|
2
| | Time Client actor may implement the SNTP option | 60 | Table 7.2-1 | 4/30/19 5:20:24 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| CT | CT-7 | reviewed | Testable |
0
|
2
| | Time Client may implement the Secured NTP option | 60 | Table 7.2-1 | 4/30/19 5:20:24 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| ITI1 | ITI1-1 | reviewed | Testable |
0
|
1
| | The Time Server shall support NTP define in Network Time Protocol Version 3. RFC1305. | 13 | Section 3.1.4.1 | 7/11/19 2:51:39 PM by ceoche |
|
| ITI1 | ITI1-10 | reviewed | Testable |
0
|
1
| | The Time Client may also support for automated discovering of the Time Server address. | 13 | Section 3.1.4.1 | 7/11/19 2:51:40 PM by ceoche |
|
| ITI1 | ITI1-2 | reviewed | Testable |
0
|
1
| | The Time Server shall support SNTP define in Simple Network Time Protocol RFC4330. | 13 | Section 3.1.4.1 | 7/11/19 2:51:40 PM by ceoche |
|