| ATNA | ATNA-1 | | Testable |
2
|
4
| I think this is redundant to ATNA-11. This is just a generic statement about the ITI-19 transaction. > No, the use of bi-directionnal certificate authentication is implicit in ITI19-1, this assertion makes it explicit. | The Audit Trail and Node Authentication Integration Profile requires the use of bi-directional certificate-based node authentication for connections to and from each node.dedede | 72 | Section 9.4 | 3/18/24 7:30:37 AM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-11 | | Testable |
3
|
2
| Are we going to duplicate the assertions for SN or SA, or just link these assertions to both actors. I think we should link to both. | Secure Node actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile shall support the Authentication Node [ITI-19] transaction | 69 | Table 9.1-1 | 3/18/24 7:40:36 AM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-13 | | Testable |
1
|
2
| This is a grouping requirement. ITI-1 is not required by the ATNA profile. > According to 2nd Review group, the TF is the reference. | Secure Node actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile shall perform the Maintain Time [ITI-1] transaction | 72 | Table 9.3-1 | 5/22/23 5:01:36 PM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-14 | | Testable |
2
|
2
| I disagree with this assertion. Section 9.7 reads "If the product claims only to include the Secure Application Actor, that indicates that only those security features that apply to the application features are provided by the product." I expect SAs to support ITI-19 for its IHE transactions that carry PHI. > Yes, this is the philosophy of the SA actor in the TF : "required only for transactions containing PHI". According to 2nd Review group, the TF is the reference, so we won't delete this assertion. | Secure Application actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile may perform the Authentication Node [ITI-19] transaction | 69 | Table 9.1-1 | 8/26/19 5:25:26 PM by ceoche |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-17 | | Testable |
1
|
2
| | The Secure Node Actor shall include the Authenticate Node [ITI-19] transaction for all network connections that may expose private information. | 69 | Table 9.1-1 | 8/26/19 5:25:26 PM by ceoche |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-18 | | Testable |
4
|
2
| | The Secure Node Actor shall ensure all local user activity (login, logout, etc.) protected to ensure only authorized users. | 69 | Section 9.1.1.1 | 3/15/24 2:32:26 PM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-19 | | Testable |
1
|
2
| I think this is redundant with assertion ATNA-12 | The Secure Node Actor shall include the record Audit Event as specified in ITI TF-2a: 3.20 | 69 | Section 9.1.1.1 | 7/11/19 7:02:45 PM by ceoche |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-2 | | Testable |
2
|
3
| probably not a testable assertion | Secure Nodes shall either prohibit, or be designed and verified to prevent access to PHI, whenever connections are not bi-directionally node-authenticated . | 69 | Section 9.1.1 | 3/8/24 9:20:47 AM by vhofman |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-23 | | Testable |
1
|
2
| | Secure Node actor may support the Radiology Audit Trail option | 71 | Table 9.2-1 | 6/29/22 2:30:45 PM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-24 | | Testable |
1
|
2
| | Secure Application actors may support the Radiology Audit Trail option | 71 | Table 9.2-1 | 5/23/23 9:33:12 AM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-25 | | Testable |
1
|
1
| | Actors in the IHE Radiology domain Profiles which claim support of the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile are required to implement the Radiology Audit Trail option. | 83 | Section 9.5.2 | 5/23/23 9:31:52 AM by testAuto |
|
| ATNA | ATNA-9 | | Testable |
2
|
2
| | When an implementation chooses to support this Integration Profile for an actor, non-IHE applications that process PHI shall detect and report auditable events, and protect access. | 72 | Section 9.4 | 7/11/19 7:25:04 PM by ceoche |
|
| CT | CT-4 | reviewed | Testable |
1
|
2
| | Time Client actor which claims support for the Consistent Time (CT) integration profile shall perform the Maintain Time [ITI-1] transaction | 60 | Table 7.1-1 | 4/30/19 5:20:24 PM by NicolasBailliet |
|
| ITI1 | ITI1-11 | reviewed | Testable |
1
|
1
| | Implementations must support a time synchronization accuracy with a median error of less than one second. | 13 | Section 3.1.4.1.2 | 7/11/19 2:51:40 PM by ceoche |
|
| ITI1 | ITI1-4 | reviewed | Testable |
1
|
1
| | The Time Client shall support at least SNTP (RFC4330) or NTP v3 (RFC1305). | 13 | Section 3.1.4.1 | 7/11/19 2:51:40 PM by ceoche |
|
| ITI18 | ITI18-1 | reviewed | Testable |
1
|
1
| | The ebXML Registry stored query facility (Invoke Stored Query transaction) accepts the following parameters for returnType : 'LeafClass' or 'ObjectRef' | 93 | Section 3.18.4.1.2.3 | 7/23/19 11:36:04 AM by aeschlimann |
|
| ITI18 | ITI18-10 | reviewed | Testable |
1
|
1
| | Document Consumer actors implementing this transaction (ITI-18) shall implement one or more of these queries as needed to support the use cases it implements | 98 | Section 3.18.4.1.2.3.7 | 7/23/19 11:42:54 AM by aeschlimann |
|
| ITI18 | ITI18-13 | reviewed | Testable |
1
|
1
| | An error shall be returned when an unsupported stored query ID is received | 112 | Section 3.18.4.1.2.4 | 8/26/19 4:36:00 PM by aeschlimann |
|
| ITI18 | ITI18-16 | reviewed | Testable |
2
|
1
| | The query request and response will be transmitted using Web Services, according to the requirements specified in ITI TF-2x: Appendix V | 114 | Section 3.18.4.1.2.7 | 7/23/19 11:42:59 AM by aeschlimann |
|
| ITI18 | ITI18-17 | reviewed | Testable |
1
|
1
| | The Document Registry Actor shall accept a Registry Stored Query Request formatted as a SIMPLE SOAP message and respond with a Registry Stored Query Response formatted as a SIMPLE SOAP message | 114 | Section 3.18.4.1.2.7 | 7/23/19 11:38:01 AM by aeschlimann |
|