Search Criteria : 5 assertions found for this search Review filtered assertions

Assertion

Applies to

Applied to
Not applied to

Coverage

Covered by
Not covered by
Id scheme
Assertion id
Status
Testable?
#Coverage
#Applies to
Comment
Predicate
Page
Tags
Last changed
Actions
ATNAATNA-1Testable 2 4 I think this is redundant to ATNA-11. This is just a generic statement about the ITI-19 transaction. > No, the use of bi-directionnal certificate authentication is implicit in ITI19-1, this assertion makes it explicit.The Audit Trail and Node Authentication Integration Profile requires the use of bi-directional certificate-based node authentication for connections to and from each node.dedede72Section 9.43/18/24 7:30:37 AM by testAuto
ATNAATNA-11Testable 3 2 Are we going to duplicate the assertions for SN or SA, or just link these assertions to both actors. I think we should link to both.Secure Node actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile shall support the Authentication Node [ITI-19] transaction69Table 9.1-13/18/24 7:40:36 AM by testAuto
ATNAATNA-13Testable 1 2 This is a grouping requirement. ITI-1 is not required by the ATNA profile. > According to 2nd Review group, the TF is the reference.Secure Node actor which claims support for the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile shall perform the Maintain Time [ITI-1] transaction72Table 9.3-15/22/23 5:01:36 PM by testAuto
ATNAATNA-23Testable 1 2 Secure Node actor may support the Radiology Audit Trail option71Table 9.2-16/29/22 2:30:45 PM by testAuto
ATNAATNA-25Testable 1 1 Actors in the IHE Radiology domain Profiles which claim support of the Audit Trail and Node Authentication (ATNA) integration profile are required to implement the Radiology Audit Trail option.83Section 9.5.25/23/23 9:31:52 AM by testAuto